Posts Tagged ‘microsoft’

How to sync your program’s plugins using Live Mesh

Cloud Computing, Concepts, How To, tech | Posted by [[Neo]] March 14th, 2009

I’m sure you’ve been at work, thinking “Crap, I don’t want to go home and do this, because I don’t have the software there.” Or maybe you do have the software, but you don’t have some certain set of plugins (i.e. Photoshop Brushes for a graphic designer), and you need a way to get those things synchronized in both places at once. ***As such, this experiment implies that I will NOT be using this program in two locations simultaneously.*** (That’s not to say that it can’t be done – but it is to say that it will require more human intervention to resolve the file version conflicts than I wish to do.)

Well, I have an answer – and this example will use the Digsby Instant Messenger client. (I’ll get technical after the story below.) Here’s a little background… Read the rest of this entry »

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Microsoft and an OpenSource Operating System

Concepts | Posted by [[Neo]] January 30th, 2006

I had started thinking about this today just before I started seeing articles hitting around the subject

Neo: do you think that if msft released a open source vista that people would edit it to make it more stable? or just try to put hacks in it and release it as a error fix
wizard: both…i dont think the opensource community would trust msft to follow the GPL
Neo: hmm…well, I am refering to a genuine effort on msft’s part, for the speculation, to follow the gpl…it may not be the best os that they release as opensource
wizard: i still dont think the community would embrace it
Neo: rgr… I don’t think they would either…I think an effort like that would tank, except for the .NET fanbois
wizard: i think it would be too little too late, it’d take years for the OS to be developed into something worth using over ‘nix
Neo: yeah, unless they relased like Windows XP or something, and gave people the source to upgrade how they saw fit to fix instabilities and security flaws. I think it’d have to be something current, and useful for the people to thinker with
wizard: ..yes but also, i guarantee you that if XP went open source today, there’d be millions of hacks by this time tommorow because people just have not found them yet without getting a look at the code
Neo: I concur.

What if Microsoft actually released an open source project? What would that do for them? What would that do for Google and Linux? How would the open source community react to such a move? How would the view of the company change in the eyes of the consumer?
Read the rest of this entry »

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Windows Vienna

Concepts | Posted by [[Neo]] January 20th, 2006

So earlier today Microsoft announced their next operating system named Windows Vienna. Read the article here on news.com.

Now, I don’t know about you, but to me it seems foolish to announce plans for an operating system that is a successor to an operating system that’s not even released yet. Firstly, they’re having delays and problems with Vista getting it out on time, and have delayed it for nearly a year after it’s original release date. And second, you’re going to have people that won’t upgrade their system because they want to get the latest, and if Vista is just going to be replaced in a year or so after its release, why not just keep using XP until Vienna comes out? I mean XP works just fine…far better than any other operating system MSFT has released in the past (except for the stability of Windows 3.1.1 but we won’t go into that.)

However, though the name has been announced, there are no details out about what this OS will be for or like. So it gives people a chance to make predictions like myself.

Now, I have been saying this for at least a year now, that software will be streamed over the internet to your computer, and we’re starting to see the beginnings of this in websites and programs like writely.com for word processing, and other applications. Microsoft has even set up a Live website for their streamed services these days, which include Office Live and Messenger Live. So what’s missing? And why would Microsoft steal the thunder from their yet-released operating system?

Perhaps because it’s going to be Windows Live – a streamed, subscription based operating system. Piracy is rampant throughout the software world, with some of the more prominent programs like operating systems and productivity packages.

So why not give Windows away for free? Windows Vienna will be an advertisement based operating system, by which one can remove the advertisements via a paid subscription to license the software. No more piracy…no more lost sales. The only thing they’ll have to face is the people hacking the system to remove the ads.

Welcome to the new world of software. That’s my prediction.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline